Michigan Battery Storage Zoning: Quincy Township’s BESS Restrictions

Key Highlights

• Quincy Township restricted utility-scale battery storage to industrial zones under a PA 233 compatible ordinance.

• The proposed 180 MW Santina Energy project accelerated local concerns over siting, safety, and local control.

• Michigan communities are replacing temporary moratoriums with permanent battery storage zoning regulations.

• Fire-propagation prevention and hazardous gas management are becoming key considerations in BESS siting decisions.

A Shift in Michigan BESS Zoning

Michigan townships are moving beyond temporary battery storage moratoriums and adopting permanent zoning restrictions instead. Quincy Township’s recent utility-scale battery energy storage system (BESS) ordinance offers one of the clearest examples yet of how municipalities are responding to Michigan’s PA 233 renewable energy siting framework.

The ordinance restricts utility-scale battery storage projects to industrial zoning districts through a special land use approval process. While the decision applies only to Quincy Township, its implications extend far beyond Branch County. It reflects a growing trend among Michigan communities seeking to preserve local authority while preparing for larger and more complex energy infrastructure projects.

As utility-scale battery storage deployment expands across the state, Quincy Township is emerging as an important case study in how municipalities balance renewable energy goals with public safety, emergency preparedness, and land-use authority.

Why Quincy Township Acted

Quincy Township’s ordinance emerged amid discussions surrounding a proposed 180 MW Santina Energy battery storage project. While the project itself became the catalyst, the concerns driving the ordinance were already building across many Michigan communities.

The Santina Energy Project

Battery storage projects are becoming larger, more visible, and increasingly important to grid operations. As project sizes increase, local officials are asking tougher questions about emergency response capability, infrastructure impacts, and long-term land-use compatibility.

A 180 MW facility is not viewed as a typical commercial development. It is often viewed as major industrial infrastructure, particularly in rural communities where large-scale energy projects have historically been limited.

The Santina Energy proposal accelerated those conversations in Quincy Township, prompting officials to move beyond temporary restrictions and establish a permanent zoning framework.

Local Concerns

Local officials and residents raised concerns about emergency preparedness, industrial land use, infrastructure impacts, and the township’s ability to maintain oversight of large energy projects.

Those concerns were amplified by the size of the proposed facility and the limited experience many rural communities have with utility-scale battery storage.

As a result, battery storage projects are increasingly being evaluated through a public safety and land-use lens, not solely as renewable energy infrastructure.

A Statewide Trend

What happened in Quincy Township reflects a broader shift occurring throughout Michigan.

Communities are recognizing that battery storage deployment is accelerating while state renewable energy policies continue evolving. Local officials increasingly believe that if they want to preserve authority over where these projects are built, they need to act before projects enter the permitting pipeline.

That reality leads directly to Michigan’s PA 233 framework.

Understanding PA 233

Quincy Township’s ordinance was part of a broader response to Michigan’s Public Act 233 (PA 233), a law that changed how large renewable energy and battery storage projects can be approved across the state.

PA 233 created a state-level siting process for qualifying renewable energy and energy storage projects through the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC). While the law was designed to accelerate energy development, it also allows local governments to retain authority through compatible ordinances.

Compatible Ordinances and Local Control

Under PA 233, communities that adopt compatible ordinances maintain a stronger role in reviewing renewable energy and battery storage projects. These ordinances establish local standards for setbacks, land use, screening requirements, and project locations.

As municipalities began evaluating the law, many concluded their existing zoning codes needed updating. Local governments across Michigan started reviewing renewable energy ordinances, revisiting special land use requirements, and determining how battery storage projects should be classified within their zoning codes.

From Moratoriums to Permanent Restrictions

Many communities initially responded with temporary moratoriums while they studied PA 233 and updated their regulations. Over time, however, local officials recognized that temporary pauses would eventually expire. Permanent zoning ordinances offered a more durable solution.

Quincy Township’s ordinance reflects that shift. Rather than relying on a short-term moratorium, the township adopted a permanent framework that restricts utility-scale battery storage to industrial zoning districts and requires special land use approval.

For communities concerned about preserving local authority, that approach provides greater certainty and stronger long-term control over future development.

Why Battery Storage Faces More Scrutiny

Utility-scale battery storage is becoming an essential part of the modern electric grid. These systems help balance renewable energy generation, improve reliability, and provide power when demand is highest.

Despite those benefits, battery storage projects often face more scrutiny than other forms of renewable energy development.

A major reason is safety.

Unlike solar projects, battery storage systems contain large amounts of stored energy. When a lithium-ion battery cell experiences an internal failure, it can trigger thermal runaway, a chain reaction that can spread from one cell to neighboring cells.

Several high-profile battery storage incidents across the United States have increased public awareness of these risks and intensified scrutiny of how large-scale projects are designed and operated.

Emergency Preparedness Concerns

For local governments, the issue extends beyond the battery technology itself.

Municipal officials must consider whether their communities have the resources, training, and emergency response capabilities needed to support utility-scale battery storage projects. As project sizes increase, those questions become more important.

Common concerns include:

• How can the likelihood of thermal runaway be reduced?

• Can fire propagation be prevented?

• How would local responders handle an incident?

• Are evacuation plans necessary?

• What happens if hazardous gases are released?

• Does the community have adequate emergency response resources?

These concerns do not automatically stop projects from moving forward. However, they increasingly influence where projects are permitted, how they are reviewed, and what safety requirements municipalities choose to impose.

In Quincy Township and many similar communities, emergency preparedness and public safety have become major factors in battery storage zoning decisions.

Why Battery Safety Is Becoming a Zoning Issue

As communities evaluate battery storage projects, safety concerns are playing a larger role in siting decisions.

Municipal officials are no longer focused solely on where projects should be built. They are also evaluating how projects address fire risk, emergency response, hazardous gases, and overall public safety.

The Shift Toward Prevention

Historically, battery storage safety discussions focused on suppression and emergency response. Today, many communities are asking a different question: can risks be reduced before an incident occurs?

That shift is changing how municipalities evaluate battery storage technology and influencing the safety standards they expect from new projects.

How EticaAG Addresses These Concerns

EticaAG’s LiquidShield™ immersion cooling technology continuously transfers heat away from battery cells, reducing the likelihood of thermal runaway. If an internal cell failure occurs, the dielectric fluid isolates cells from oxygen, immediately suppressing flames and preventing fire propagation.

Municipal concerns often extend beyond fire alone. Battery incidents can also generate hazardous gases that create risks for first responders and nearby communities. EticaAG’s HazGuard technology addresses this challenge by containing, neutralizing, and safely exhausting battery off-gases.

As communities like Quincy Township evaluate future battery storage proposals, technologies that prevent fire propagation and address hazardous gas management will likely play a larger role in siting and zoning decisions.

What Quincy Township Signals for the Future of BESS Development

Quincy Township’s ordinance illustrates how Michigan communities are adapting to both PA 233 and the growing deployment of utility-scale battery storage.

The township’s approach reflects several trends already emerging across the state:

• More permanent battery storage zoning ordinances

• Greater reliance on industrial-only siting requirements

• Increased emphasis on emergency response planning

• More scrutiny of thermal runaway prevention strategies

• Greater focus on hazardous gas management

• Continued debate over state versus local authority

For developers, Quincy Township highlights the importance of engaging with local communities early and demonstrating how projects address safety, emergency response, and land-use concerns.

For municipalities, the ordinance reflects a growing effort to preserve local authority while adapting to Michigan’s evolving renewable energy framework.

As more communities update their zoning codes under PA 233, battery storage projects will increasingly be evaluated not only on their grid benefits, but also on how effectively they address the public safety concerns driving local decision-making.

Frequently Asked Questions